Prioritises simplicity
Prefer the structure needing less repeated intervention.
Both flat structures require less export timing work than a dynamic payment.
Tariff comparison
Edited by Rob Gibbs. Guidance reviewed: .
Choose between two flat export-payment structures after checking eligibility and import pairing. There is no universal winner: use the measured evidence window, then test the result against your own consumption, equipment and current eligibility.
Region: London. Profile: Typical household. Evidence window: 2026-08-01 to 2026-08-31.
Historic profile-weighted evidence, not a bill, forecast or switching quote. Standing charges remain separate.
Comparable evidence is incomplete, so this page does not name a lower-rate choice.
Prefer the structure needing less repeated intervention.
Both flat structures require less export timing work than a dynamic payment.
Give more weight to the option that rewards controllable timing.
The published payment can change with product versions; exported kWh and eligibility drive total receipts.
Check the equipment-led option only after exact compatibility is confirmed.
Both require eligible generation, export registration and suitable half-hourly metering.
| Feature | What differs |
|---|---|
| Equipment | Both require eligible generation, export registration and suitable half-hourly metering. |
| Eligibility | Confirm export MPAN, generation evidence, current payment rate and whether the chosen product requires Octopus import. |
| Effort and automation | Both flat structures require less export timing work than a dynamic payment. |
| Price variability | The published payment can change with product versions; exported kWh and eligibility drive total receipts. |
| Import/export pairing | SEG can be supplied separately under the scheme, while individual Octopus products can set their own import conditions. |
Both require eligible generation, export registration and suitable half-hourly metering.
Confirm export MPAN, generation evidence, current payment rate and whether the chosen product requires Octopus import.
Both flat structures require less export timing work than a dynamic payment.
The published payment can change with product versions; exported kWh and eligibility drive total receipts.
SEG can be supplied separately under the scheme, while individual Octopus products can set their own import conditions.
Export payments are kept separate from import standing charges; no household import bill is assumed.
One complete month can differ from a trailing year. Heating, solar generation, EV mileage and wholesale conditions can all move with the season, so the evidence is not a forecast.
A meaningful break-even needs comparable unit rates, standing charges and one explicit annual-use profile over the same evidence window. Export volume and timing are unknown, so a household break-even cannot be inferred.
No. The page separates measured historic evidence from household-specific constraints and does not predict future prices.
No. Export is a payment direction and no import bill is netted against it.
Yes. Rates, seasons, usage, product terms, device support and meter performance can all change.