OctoTariffs

Tariff comparison

Outgoing Octopus vs Octopus SEG

Choose between two flat export-payment structures after checking eligibility and import pairing.

Edited by Rob Gibbs. Guidance reviewed: .

Methodology · Corrections

Overall verdict

Choose between two flat export-payment structures after checking eligibility and import pairing. There is no universal winner: use the measured evidence window, then test the result against your own consumption, equipment and current eligibility.

Historic profile evidence

Region: London. Profile: Typical household. Evidence window: 2026-08-01 to 2026-08-31.

Historic profile-weighted evidence, not a bill, forecast or switching quote. Standing charges remain separate.

Comparable evidence is incomplete, so this page does not name a lower-rate choice.

Which household does each structure fit?

Prioritises simplicity

Prefer the structure needing less repeated intervention.

Both flat structures require less export timing work than a dynamic payment.

Can shift or automate

Give more weight to the option that rewards controllable timing.

The published payment can change with product versions; exported kWh and eligibility drive total receipts.

Has specialist equipment

Check the equipment-led option only after exact compatibility is confirmed.

Both require eligible generation, export registration and suitable half-hourly metering.

Full feature comparison

FeatureWhat differs
EquipmentBoth require eligible generation, export registration and suitable half-hourly metering.
EligibilityConfirm export MPAN, generation evidence, current payment rate and whether the chosen product requires Octopus import.
Effort and automationBoth flat structures require less export timing work than a dynamic payment.
Price variabilityThe published payment can change with product versions; exported kWh and eligibility drive total receipts.
Import/export pairingSEG can be supplied separately under the scheme, while individual Octopus products can set their own import conditions.

Equipment

Both require eligible generation, export registration and suitable half-hourly metering.

Eligibility

Confirm export MPAN, generation evidence, current payment rate and whether the chosen product requires Octopus import.

Household effort

Both flat structures require less export timing work than a dynamic payment.

Price risk

The published payment can change with product versions; exported kWh and eligibility drive total receipts.

Import and export pairing

SEG can be supplied separately under the scheme, while individual Octopus products can set their own import conditions.

Standing-charge treatment

Export payments are kept separate from import standing charges; no household import bill is assumed.

Seasonality

One complete month can differ from a trailing year. Heating, solar generation, EV mileage and wholesale conditions can all move with the season, so the evidence is not a forecast.

Break-even limits

A meaningful break-even needs comparable unit rates, standing charges and one explicit annual-use profile over the same evidence window. Export volume and timing are unknown, so a household break-even cannot be inferred.

When the answer could change

  • Your annual kWh or half-hourly usage shape changes.
  • Current product versions, prices or standing charges change.
  • Equipment compatibility or supplier eligibility changes.
  • A different season changes heating, driving, generation or export.

Questions people ask

Does Outgoing Octopus vs Octopus SEG have one winner?

No. The page separates measured historic evidence from household-specific constraints and does not predict future prices.

Does the ranking include a full bill?

No. Export is a payment direction and no import bill is netted against it.

Can the result change after I switch?

Yes. Rates, seasons, usage, product terms, device support and meter performance can all change.

Related equipment guides

Primary sources