Prioritises simplicity
Prefer the structure needing less repeated intervention.
Flux leaves scheduling to the household; Intelligent Flux lets Octopus control eligible battery operation.
Tariff comparison
Edited by Rob Gibbs. Guidance reviewed: .
Choose manual battery scheduling or managed optimisation for a compatible home battery. There is no universal winner: use the measured evidence window, then test the result against your own consumption, equipment and current eligibility.
Region: London. Profile: Typical household. Evidence window: 2026-08-01 to 2026-08-31.
Historic profile-weighted evidence, not a bill, forecast or switching quote. Standing charges remain separate.
26.71 p/kWh profile-weighted unit rate
42.42 p/day standing charge
2,700 kWh annual scenario: £876.07
22.47 p/kWh profile-weighted unit rate
42.42 p/day standing charge
2,700 kWh annual scenario: £761.52
The annual scenario applies each historic weighted unit rate to 2,700 kWh and adds 365 daily standing charges. It is illustrative, not a forecast or personal bill.
On this evidence window and profile, intelligent-flux had the lower weighted import unit rate. That is not a forecast or universal winner.
Prefer the structure needing less repeated intervention.
Flux leaves scheduling to the household; Intelligent Flux lets Octopus control eligible battery operation.
Give more weight to the option that rewards controllable timing.
Both use defined periods, but achievable cost depends on losses, power limits, household load and export timing.
Check the equipment-led option only after exact compatibility is confirmed.
Both centre on solar and battery storage; Intelligent Flux additionally needs an exact supported battery connection and control permission.
| Feature | What differs |
|---|---|
| Equipment | Both centre on solar and battery storage; Intelligent Flux additionally needs an exact supported battery connection and control permission. |
| Eligibility | Confirm import and export metering, generation evidence, battery compatibility and current combined-product terms. |
| Effort and automation | Flux leaves scheduling to the household; Intelligent Flux lets Octopus control eligible battery operation. |
| Price variability | Both use defined periods, but achievable cost depends on losses, power limits, household load and export timing. |
| Import/export pairing | Treat these as linked import/export structures; this comparison does not calculate battery earnings. |
Both centre on solar and battery storage; Intelligent Flux additionally needs an exact supported battery connection and control permission.
Confirm import and export metering, generation evidence, battery compatibility and current combined-product terms.
Flux leaves scheduling to the household; Intelligent Flux lets Octopus control eligible battery operation.
Both use defined periods, but achievable cost depends on losses, power limits, household load and export timing.
Treat these as linked import/export structures; this comparison does not calculate battery earnings.
The historic evidence displays standing charges separately. A lower profile-weighted unit rate is not a lower annual bill unless daily charges and annual kWh are also included.
One complete month can differ from a trailing year. Heating, solar generation, EV mileage and wholesale conditions can all move with the season, so the evidence is not a forecast.
A meaningful break-even needs comparable unit rates, standing charges and one explicit annual-use profile over the same evidence window. Half-hourly or daily rates and household timing vary; one static unit-rate crossing would imply precision the evidence does not have.
No. The page separates measured historic evidence from household-specific constraints and does not predict future prices.
No. The unit-rate evidence and standing charge are shown separately; other bill adjustments and future rates are excluded.
Yes. Rates, seasons, usage, product terms, device support and meter performance can all change.