Prioritises simplicity
Prefer the structure needing less repeated intervention.
Agile rewards repeated scheduling; Tracker needs less within-day attention.
Tariff comparison
Edited by Rob Gibbs. Guidance reviewed: .
Choose between active half-hourly shifting and a rate that changes once a day. There is no universal winner: use the measured evidence window, then test the result against your own consumption, equipment and current eligibility.
Region: London. Profile: Typical household. Evidence window: 2026-08-01 to 2026-08-31.
Historic profile-weighted evidence, not a bill, forecast or switching quote. Standing charges remain separate.
27.16 p/kWh profile-weighted unit rate
39.54 p/day standing charge
2,700 kWh annual scenario: £877.58
27.71 p/kWh profile-weighted unit rate
42.42 p/day standing charge
2,700 kWh annual scenario: £903.01
The annual scenario applies each historic weighted unit rate to 2,700 kWh and adds 365 daily standing charges. It is illustrative, not a forecast or personal bill.
On this evidence window and profile, agile had the lower weighted import unit rate. That is not a forecast or universal winner.
Prefer the structure needing less repeated intervention.
Agile rewards repeated scheduling; Tracker needs less within-day attention.
Give more weight to the option that rewards controllable timing.
Both vary. Agile exposes every half hour; Tracker exposes day-to-day wholesale movement.
Check the equipment-led option only after exact compatibility is confirmed.
Both need suitable smart-meter data; automation is optional but can make Agile easier to use.
| Feature | What differs |
|---|---|
| Equipment | Both need suitable smart-meter data; automation is optional but can make Agile easier to use. |
| Eligibility | Confirm both current products are offered for the selected region and meter. |
| Effort and automation | Agile rewards repeated scheduling; Tracker needs less within-day attention. |
| Price variability | Both vary. Agile exposes every half hour; Tracker exposes day-to-day wholesale movement. |
| Import/export pairing | Verify any export pairing separately under current Octopus terms. |
Both need suitable smart-meter data; automation is optional but can make Agile easier to use.
Confirm both current products are offered for the selected region and meter.
Agile rewards repeated scheduling; Tracker needs less within-day attention.
Both vary. Agile exposes every half hour; Tracker exposes day-to-day wholesale movement.
Verify any export pairing separately under current Octopus terms.
The historic evidence displays standing charges separately. A lower profile-weighted unit rate is not a lower annual bill unless daily charges and annual kWh are also included.
One complete month can differ from a trailing year. Heating, solar generation, EV mileage and wholesale conditions can all move with the season, so the evidence is not a forecast.
A meaningful break-even needs comparable unit rates, standing charges and one explicit annual-use profile over the same evidence window. Half-hourly or daily rates and household timing vary; one static unit-rate crossing would imply precision the evidence does not have.
No. The page separates measured historic evidence from household-specific constraints and does not predict future prices.
No. The unit-rate evidence and standing charge are shown separately; other bill adjustments and future rates are excluded.
Yes. Rates, seasons, usage, product terms, device support and meter performance can all change.